Employee Engagement: Way forward for a successful Organization

Employee Engagement: Way forward for a successful Organization 


Definition of Employee Engagement 


Employee engagement or employee relation is a two-way process where the employer and employee are responsible for the success of the organization. Employee engagement could be defined as an emotional attachment towards the organization, highly involved in the work with enthusiasm for the success of the Organization (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010). In engagement an employee, “is going extra mile beyond the employment contractual agreement” to fulfil the assigned job, which is discretionary behaviour and part of psychological contract (Purcell et al, 2003)



Ingredients of job engagement as per Armstrong (2010) are motivation, commitment & organizational citizenship behaviour. Therefore, employee engagement is a blend of all three ingredients. 

An engaged employee will be loyal in attitude, will go beyond their minimum expectations to complete an assignment and will be a promoter of their company to the clients. The result of the above will be lower accident rate, higher output, fewer misunderstandings, and more creativity, less staff turnover & reduced health issues (Vorina, 2017)

Employee engagement is an element of Human Resource Management “creating opportunities for employees to connect with their colleagues, managers and wider organization” (Armstrong, 2010).  Both parties have their own expectations, legal rights and responsibilities. The employees will perform their duties and task in a satisfactory manner as per organizational policies and procedures & employers in return treat them reasonably, fairly and consistently. MacLeod and Clarke (2009) describe this as mutual respect between employee and management.

As pointed out by MacLeod and Clarke (2009) engagement is like two sides of a coin where management should lay foundation to capture the heart and soul of the employee and employee in return should fulfil the organizations goals. As explained by O’Riordan (2017) HR is important to “Create a positive employment relationship between management and employees. Employees’ will give their best when they are given autonomy & empowerment(Stewart, 2012) to carry out their work independently to achieve the set KPI’s of the organization.


The importance of engagement is elaborated in IES (2003)and states that people should be treated as stake holders of an organization, ownership and empowerment plays a major role in engagement and improve company performance.  Importance of engagement was explained in service profit chain by Robinson et al (2004)  as “from People to Profit” starting from the committed line manager coupled with fair and rewarding company culture, the level of employees engagement increases which enhances customer satisfaction leading to higher customer spending and increased sales & profitability of the organization.


Passionate employees who are engaged are focused on achieving company’s goals at any cost, which is a key competitive advantage in the modern world (Vorina et al, 2017). Further, improved employee productivity had a positive effect on organizational financial performance (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017). The bond between leaders and employees is an essential element for engaging employees, which in turn increased organizational profitability (Osborne et al, 2017).

As per Richard Branson of Virginia Group, the employers should put “purpose and passion at the heart of their plans” further he states that employer and employee should do what they love and love what they do, which leads to self satisfaction and contributes to satisfactory business performance.


A survey was conducted by Postgraduate Institute of Management (PIM) among 12000 employees of IT, apparel sector & BPO/KPO sector in Sri Lanka. It was revealed during the survey that “Meaningfulness and the awareness of the job, supportive senior management and supportive co-worker relationship are the factors that drive employee engagement”(Daily FT, 2017)

Evolution of employee engagement

This concept evolved from industrial relations (unitarism) to employee relations (Pluralism). In unitarist approach the employer considered their employees to share the same concerns and interests (collective orientation) which lead to formation of trade unions and industrial revelation in the past. With that the employers realized that individualized relationship with employees is important for the success of a business (Millmore et al, 2007).

The short Film - Engage for Success explains how employee engagement help organisations to be successful business entities.


Factors affecting employee engagement

                           

1. Effective Communication and feedback

Effective communication plays a significant role in employee engagement (Osborne et al, 2017). A two-way communication between the employer and employee is important (IQN, 2017). Employer should clearly communicate their expectations, organizational goals and targets to their employees and employees in return should be given a chance to report their grievances and concerns. This employee voice to be heard by the management and this makes the organization “an employer of choice” (Armstrong, 2010). Organizations should look for leaders that can both communicate the organization’s vision and secure employees’ support in achieving organizational goals (Osborne et al, 2017) and employees to be given a chance to open up without any repercussions. The best way to gain employee views are the anonymous surveys in which people feel completely safe to speak their minds. Its proven that majority of people open up, and ideas come out at informal meetings or gatherings (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010)


Feedback is a great way of creating a learning environment, when feedback is extended by a genuine leader who truly cares about employees. The time the employees realize the leader truly cares about them, they starts respecting the leader and will listen and obey. Further, will be ready to hear any feedback extended since staff realizes the intention is for their own good and the success of the organization (Cook, 2015). Therefore, managers should use every opportunity for gathering feedback without waiting for the annual appraisal (Walker, 2012). Management needs to create a feedback culture and the leaders to invite feedback from others on their performance, their behaviour and its impact on others(Cook, 2015). As per MacLeod and Clarke (2009) Tesco Chief Executive Terry Leahy has recorded his reaction when he realized that the company knew more about its customers than it did about its employees, and laid foundation to learn about their employee’s strengths and needs which motivated staff to give their best to the organization.



2. Engagement at the time of recruitment

Ideally Engagement must start at the time of recruitment, when calling for candidates for a particular job, the advertisements must outline the attractive features such as challenging work assignments, highly skilled team environment, and minimal supervision. Applicants will be motivated by these features and act in response. At the interview the management should communicate the role and the expectations clearly and not keep space for ambiguities. The candidate should be encouraged to communicate their concerns and raise queries and management in return to be flexible in order to suite each and every requirement of the employee. A women candidate could be single parent etc, where flexible working hours, family health benefits and onsite day care centre to be introduced and encourage work life balance for a sustainable and a long lasting relationship. Further in selecting the right individual for the right job with few performance problems (Vance, 2006) Recruit candidates who are willing to be engaged which increase engagement and organizational performance. As CEO of the UK’s Happy Pvt Ltd, which had been awarded by the Great Place to Work Institute writes, recruite for the candidates attitude and then train for skills (Stewart, 2012).



3. Training and Development 

Management further needs to spend on Training and Development to their recruited employees, in order to understand the job, acquire knowledge and development of skills which will benefit the employee to perform the job with minimum supervision and without mistakes. An employee with adequate knowledge, skill, and experience become experts in their field and enhance the self esteem and increases the engagement level (Armstrong & Taylor, 2014) However, “Organizations should not embark on an attempt to raise engagement levels unless they are prepared to invest sufficiently into it — time, effort and money.” (Robinson et al, 2004) The training to be extended to line managers as well, they should be fully equipped to engage the employees for a mutually beneficial relationship for organization and the employee. The line managers must provide positive response to employees, improving relationship between leaders and employees and employees feel valuable & worthwhile. The leader should communicate differently with each employee since they come from different background (Osborne et al, 2017). “The importance of the line manager in the engagement model, for example, suggests that a major investment in line management development might be needed” (Robinson et al, 2004). The reseach done on people who leaves organizations have proved that people leave organizationa not for better propects but due to ineffective managers (Walker, 2012).  





4. Reward Structure

Reward & Compensation plays a major role in employee engagement. It could be either financial reward such as salary, bonus, incentives and travel allowance and non-financial benefits such as on-site day care, employee assistance programs, subsidized cafeteria, company picnics, company gymnasium facilities & promotions. As pointed out by Millmore et al, (2007) “The rewards from employment can be economic, social and psychological”. A performance management system could be utilized for rewarding high performing employees with higher salary increments and bonuses to encourage them to be more engaged (Vance 2006). The management must include in the appraisal the training requirements of the employees and line managers to indicate that they truly care to sit down and discuss about employee’s future aspirations and their further development needs. Further, as per Osborne et al, 2017 “Leaders of organizations that fully support employees, promote continuous learning, and are transparent in their decision-making, have a greater impact on the increased level of employee engagement”.




5. Employment security                                                                                                      
Employment security is another factor which enhances employee engagement levels. Healthy and a safe working environment will improve quality of life enhancing employee engagement. Work places should provide infrastructure to maintain healthy and a fully engaged workforce. They could provide health insurance, wellness programs, gym & yoga facilities to address the increasing health issues faced by the employees. As Scott, 2017 states “today’s active workforce has become increasingly affected by “lifestyle diseases,” such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity and these types of diseases forcing employers to adopt strategies that address the effects on employee health and well-being, engagement, and overall performance.”

The organization which I work for is a leading commercial bank and it provides the following facilities for the benefit of its staff & in order to engage them for better performance of the Bank. The management organized a series of health camps from beginning of last year onwards, opened up the reimbursement of annual medical heath check-up expenses to all staff above 40 years of age, irrespective of the rank which once only availed to executive staff. Even the spouse is entitled for and this is apart from the Hospitalization Medical Scheme available to staff members of the bank.   Further, an innovative competition was organized by the name of “Lose to Win” and the staff were grouped and over a period of time the group which lost maximum weight were awarded. In addition, Online training courses as well as class room training sessions are conducted to continuously improve the knowledge and to motivate the employees. Increments and bonuses are being decided on an online performance appraisals system and the percentage increase is decided by the score at the end of the appraisal. A concept of Chief Employee Relations Officer was introduced for the members to approach in grievances and problems. Therefore, enabling employees to report direct to CERO independent from HR. CERO appointed was a very senior member of the corporate management whom employees trust & respect. These changes were brought in after an employment survey conducted by an external company during a period of employee unrest.

Conclusion 


In conclusion it is obvious that higher levels of employee engagement “improve the customer satisfaction, productivity, and profit levels”(Osborne et al, 2017). Engagement is further elaborated by Millmore et al, 2007 as a tool for innovation, quality enhancement and a cost reduction which enhances competitive advantage. Therefore it is evident that Management must treat employees as “special and most important assets and they are the source of continuing competitive advantage"(Henderson, 2011) Therefore, it is evident that there is a correlation between the employee engagement and the satisfactory performance of an organization.

As revealed by Gallup (2006a) “out of a survey of 23,910 business units and comparing top quartile and bottom quartile financial performance with engagement scores, Gallup found that, those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile averaged 31–51 per cent more employee turnover, 51 per cent more inventory shrinkage and 62 per cent more accidents and those with engagement scores in the top quartile averaged 12 per cent higher customer advocacy, 18 per cent higher productivity and 12 per cent higher profitability.” Cook, 2015 reveals as per surveys carried out on engagement, “five per cent increase in total employee engagement correlates to a 0.7 per cent increase in operating margin and highly engaged employees were 87 per cent less likely to leave their companies than their disengaged colleagues. In 2008 onwards US experienced a financial meltdown due to disengaged employees, in turn affected the organizations financial performance and finally country’s financial performance (Purcell, 2014).

List of References


Armstrong, M (2010) Armstrong's Essential Human Resource Practice: A Guide to People Management

Armstrong, M. & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management & Practice. 13th ed. London: Koganpage.

Branson, R.  The best way to engage employees (Accessed online on 08/12/2018)   https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/richard-branson-best-way-engage-employees

Cook, S.(2015) Training Journal. Sarah Cook looks at the role in people developers have in improving employee engagement. https://www.trainingjournal.com/articles/feature/leading-engagement. (Accessed online on 07/12/2018). 

Dharmasiri, A. (Daily FT, 02/10/2017) Engaging Employees for Enterprise Effectiveness: Emerging evidence from Sri Lanka. http://www.ft.lk/columns/Engaging-employees-for-enterprise-effectiveness--Emerging-evidence-from-Sri-Lanka/4-640687. (Accessed on line on 05/12/2018).


Engage for success – Short Film accessed on line on 08/12/2018 by Chartered Management Institute.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV4YcgVIKneaq9di4afoLYw

Gallup (2006a) Feeling Good Matters in the Workplace, Gallup Inc, London.

IQN, ( 2017) Diploma in Human Resource Management Course Book by International Qualifications Network

Ivan Henderson, Human Resource Management for MBA Students 2nd edition, Published by CIPD 2011

Kompaso, S. M.&Sridevi, M. S.(2010) (Accessed online on 08/12/2018)   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49586552_Employee_Engagement_The_Key_to_Improving_Performance.

MacLeod, D and Clarke, N (2009) Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.

Millmore, M., Lewis P., Sanders M., Thornhill A., Morrow T. Strategic Human Resource Management - Contemporary issue 2007. Published by Pearson Education Limited.

Osborne, S. & Hammoud M., S. ( 2017)Effective Employee Engagement in the Workplace , International Journal of Applied Management and Technology  2017, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 50–67

Purcell, J.,Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. & Swart,J. (2003) Understanding the People and Performance Link: Unlocking the Black Box: London, Chartered Institute of Personal and Development.

Robinson, D., Perryman, S., Hayday, S. (2004) The Drivers of Employee Engagement.  Institute of Employee Studies. IES report 408.

Vance, R., J. (2006) Employee engagement & commitment: A Guide to understanding, measuring and increasing engagement in your organization (SHRM Foundation).

Vorina, A., Simonic, M., Vlasova, M. (2017) Economic Themes – An Analysis of the relationship between Job Satisfaction & employee engagement (p. 245)

Scott, A. (2017)Today’ key to improving employee performance-Workplace  Wellness. http://p5performance.org/todays-key-improving-performance-workplace-wellness(online accessed on 08/12/2108)

Stewart, H. (2012) The Happy Manifesto – Make Your Organization a Great Place to Work-Now (Foreword by professor Julion Birkshaw of London Business School)

Walker, S (2012) Employee Enagagement & Communication Research- Measurement Stratergy & Action.

































































Comments

  1. Hi Lakshmi, Moving on to more statistical aspect of engagement, Towers Perrin (2007) found that
    organisations with the highest percentage of engaged employees increased their operating income by 19 per cent and their earnings per share by 28 per cent year‐to‐year. Highly engaging organisational cultures may also have an attractive, A review of current thinking employer brand, being an employer of choice which attracts and retains the best talent (eg Martin and Hetrick, 2006)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, employee engagement leads to organizational success which was revealed from a survey conducted by Gallup (2006a) examining 23,910 business units and compared top quartile and bottom quartile financial performance with engagement scores. They found that: Those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile averaged 31–51 per cent more employee turnover, 51 per cent more inventory shrinkage and 62 per cent more
      accidents. Those with engagement scores in the top quartile averaged 12 per cent higher customer advocacy, 18 per cent higher productivity and 12 per cent higher profitability(Armstrong, 2010)

      Delete
  2. I agreed with you that it is important to keep a positive employment relationship with management and employees. Researchers show that keeping up strong relationships with others create satisfied and motivated employees in the company and they try in every possible ways to achieve the company goals. Also they feel positive and confidence to stay in the company (Civil Services, 2008).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MacLeod and Clarke (2009) pointed out that engagement is a two-way process: ‘organizations must work to engage the employee, who in turn has a choice about the level of engagement to offer the employer. Each reinforces the other.’ They also noted that ‘Engagement is about establishing mutual respect in the workplace for what people can do and be.’

      Delete
  3. Employee engagement is identified in a different view by Cummings and Worley (2005), mentioning that, looking for inputs into decisions by members of an organization which affects the organization’s performance and well being of its employees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It could be said that, once an employee has a sense of empowerment, his or her engagement and performance then exceed expectations. Further many employees yearn for advancement opportunities(Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)

      Delete
  4. More over to what you have explained here, Tredgold, (2018) illustrate five steps that drives employee engagement as Create sense of purpose, Employee involvement, Not over complicated things, Empowerment and Recognition. Though these factors drive engagement, Motivation plays a major role in employee engagement (Comaford, 2018). Engaged employees results in sustainable competitive advantage (Pandey, 2013)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes agreed. For a organisation employee engagement can improve performance and productivity, release innovation and creativity, lead to high levels of customer service, facilitate the management of change, increase retention levels and boost interest in employee development. It is also a valuable source of competitive advantage (Charted Management Institute, 2015)

      Delete
  5. In addition to what you have mentioned, Robinson et al. (2007)  highlighted that there are associations between role and engagement levels,  whereby senior managers, managers and operational hands‐on employees have  the highest engagement levels, whilst professionals and ‘back‐room staff’ are less  likely to be highly engaged with their organizations. Similarly, Blessing White  (2008) also found a difference in engagement across occupations. 

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chandani et al., 2016, suggests that positive psychology interventions can be used to target employees that are disengaged or facing low engagement levels. Understanding the workforce profile is the foremost.Secondly organizations need to help create meaning for employees in their work. This can be achieved by making the employee understand the link between his contribution of his work and the overall business goals.

      Delete
  6. Hi Lakshmi, on the topic I would like to share a point mentioned by Armstrong and Taylor (2014) called “Burnout”. It is explained as a syndrome of emotional exhaustion and cynicism. It happens due to excessive job demands, which include attempting to meet challenging, relentless and unreachable standards. The authors say in the pursuit of engagement, managements need to ensure that employees are not put under too much pressure, are provided with support when required and are recognized for what they can achieve with the resources they have available. Otherwise, it will result in factors such as failure, absenteeism or leaving the organization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In addition, recent research has shown that job resources may buffer the negative influence of job demands on work engagement. However, job resources are not only crucial for dealing with job demands but they are also important in their own right. For example, lack resources may lead to poor work engagement and increased levels of burnout symptoms (Upadyaya, 2016)

      Delete
  7. Employee engagement is a key element for the success of any organization. An employee can work but if he is not psychologically connected with the job, the result is least. There are many org globally where their employees just perform their duties… but certain selected organization ( Eg Google) where the employees are happy and engaged and the organization performances are astonishing. According to Bakkar and Scheufeli, (2008), the term of employee engagement that “it is a psychological state where employees feel a vested interest in the organization’s success and perform to a high standard that may exceed the stated requirements of the job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An engaged employee is one who produces results, does not change job frequently and more importantly is the ambassador of the company at all times (Chandani et al., 2016)

      Delete
  8. Chandani et al.(2016) list more factors affecting employee engagement, such as Health and Safety, Pay and Benefits, Performance Appraisal, Respectful Treatment of Employees, Career Development.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As explained by Armstrong (2010) the principle of work–life balance is another factor of employee engagement i.e. ‘There should be a balance between an individual’s work and their life outside work, and that this balance should be healthy".

      Delete
  9. To be able to do anything about engagement it is necessary to understand the factors that affect this – its antecedents and drivers. Crawford et al (2013:59–62) listed the following drivers:

    ●● Job challenge
    ●● Autonomy
    ●● Variety
    ●● Feedback
    ●● Fit
    ●● Opportunities for development
    ●● Rewards and recognition

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Employee engagement should Start from the top management: Employee engagement requires authority responsibility through building up clear mission, vision and qualities. Unless the general population at the top have faith in it, own it, pass it down to chiefs and representatives, and improve their authority, worker engagement will never be more than only a "corporate prevailing fashion" or "another HR thing"(Tripathi & Sharma, 2016)

      Delete
  10. When an employee demonstrates a positive, accomplished working mindset which can be characterized by dedication and absorption can be considered as an engaged employee (Kuok & Taormina, 2017). Further the positive attitude of an employee towards the organization and its value is considered as employee engagement ,an engaged employee would be aware of the business affairs and maximize performances for the betterment of the organization (Hettiararchchi & Jayarathna, 2014).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To add on to your comment : The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is a successful UK company that has the concept of employee engagement at the heart of its business strategy. The RBS model suggests that having employees who say they are satisfied with their jobs at RBS is only the starting point; as a next step, these employees should also be committed (that is, say they want to stay with the company). The ultimate goal is an engaged workforce, containing employees who are willing to make an extra effort to help the company achieve its goals(Robinson et al., 2003)

      Delete
  11. In addition what you mention rewards and reconditions will keep people highly engage and motivated. According to the diamond & diamond (2010) employees will motivate to below fact also health insurance, wellness programs, retirement plans, personal days, sick days, and vacation days, flextime, bonuses, incentives, and tuition reimbursement

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Studies have shown that financial incentives are generally not the prime motivator of commitment and engagement. Nonetheless, perceptions of unfairness can be a powerful disengaging factor. It is important for employees to feel that they are being fairly compensated for their efforts, that pay and reward structures, including bonus schemes, are fair and equitable and that performance appraisals and performance management systems are applied fairly and consistently across the organisation (Chartered Management Institute 2015)

      Delete
  12. Furthermore, with regard to engagement, The motivation element in engagement plays a vital role. Macey et al (2009: 67) stated that ‘When the work itself is meaningful it is also said to have intrinsic motivation. This means that it is not the pay or recognition that yields positive feelings of engagement but the work itself". The authors also illustrated that engaged employees ‘feel that their jobs are an important part of what they are’ (ibid: 127).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Employee motivation is directly linked to organizational commitment and employee engagement. “Organizational commitment is defined in terms of the strength of an individual’s identification with and involvement in a particular organization” , i.e. strong belief and acceptance of the organization’s goals and values, eagerness to work hard for the organization, and a desire to remain a member of the organization (Jensen, 2018)

      Delete
  13. Hi Lakshmi, motivation is a very important factor in employee engagement and if the employee will leave the organization if they are not well motivated or properly respected (Comaford, 2018). If these needs are met and if they are satisfied, they will contribute to the organization with a greater retention level (Towes Perrin, 2003).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is proved that retaining employees need a systematic effort by employers to create and foster an environment that motivates employees to remain employed, by having policies and practices in place that addresses the diverse needs of employees. The biggest challenge that organizations are facing today is not only managing their human resources but also retaining them (Paul & Vincent, 2018)

      Delete
  14. It can be added also as Employee Engagement can be defined as the spontaneous involvement in the role. (Kahn, 1990). The employees in the engagement perform themselves physically, cognitively and emotionally in the role.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The organisations/employer need to work hard to prevent, and minimize the impact of, bad experiences. They also need to ensure that employees’ development needs (including
      the special needs of professionals) are taken seriously; pay attention to, and value the roles of, support staff; and to maintain the interest of longer-serving employees (Robinson et al., 2003)

      Delete
  15. It can be noted as Employee Engagement effects the financial and the organizational accomplishments other than the employees results itself. (Shuck and Wollard, 2010). The engaged employees perform more effectively rather than the disengaged employees (SHRM Foundation, 2006). Therefore this can be identification for the organizations success.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In this connection employer must play a major role. Effective leadership provides vision and direction for employee development. The ability for leadership to effectively communicate is a basis for employee engagement (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)

      Delete
  16. Hi, ‘The Meaning of Employee Engagement’, Macey and Schneider (2008a) propose that engagement is sometimes defined on the basis of what it ‘is’ (psychological state), whilst on other occasions on the basis of the behaviours it produces (behavioural) and sometimes as a disposition or attitude towards one’s work (trait).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. General Electric CEO Jack Welch cited employee engagement first. No company, small or large, can win over the long run without energized employees who believe in the [firm's] mission and understand how to achieve it. As per Welch a company need to take the measure of employee engagement at least once a year through anonymous surveys in which people feel completely safe to speak their minds (Vance, 2016)

      Delete
  17. The versatile role of Chief Employee Experience Officer (CEEO) is proof of HR's shift as a strategic business partner. HR industry analyst Joseh Bersin, founder and principal of Bersin by Deloitte, said the CEEO's task is to know "what is making employee productive at work and making sure that the tools that they are receiving at work from IT are helpin them to get their jobs done"( Ranosa.R (2018).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CEOs can act as “chief engagement officers” and directly interact with their employees through leadership and executive communication. This is particularly relevant in today’s social media era when communication hierarchies have been blurred by the interactive, personal, democratic, empowering, and relational features of social media tools. Thus, the power distance has been reduced, bringing CEOs into life and allowing them to communicate with their employees in a friendly, authentic, and informal manner (Linjuan, 2014)

      Delete
  18. Hi, In addition: Engagement can affect employees’ attitudes, absence and turnover levels and
    various studies have demonstrated links with productivity, increasingly pointing
    to a high correlation with individual, group and organisational performance, a
    success measured through the quality of customer experience and customer
    loyalty (Hemsley Fraser, 2008, cited in The HR Director, 2008; The Conference
    Board, 2006). Organisations with higher engagement levels tend to have lower
    employee turnover, higher productivity, higher total shareholder returns and
    better financial performance (Baumruk, 2006)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For example: The U.S. Department of Labor (2015) identified employee engagement as a challenge, with a negative percentage of 35% or higher for organizations. Therefore, organizational leaders are rapidly finding ways to engage employees for long-term employment. Engaged employees are noted to having lower turnover rates and higher retention. Thirty percent of U.S. employees are engaged at work, and a staggeringly low 13% worldwide were engage. In addition, within the past 12 years, these percentages have changed minimally, meaning that worldwide, a high number of employees fail to develop and contribute at work (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)

      Delete
  19. Hi Lakshmi,
    Other than what you have implied, another construct that impacts employee engagement is leadership. According to Yukl et al., (2009), participative leader behavior increases the positive valence of work for subordinates who require more independence, while directive leader behavior is thought to be especially effective with achievement focused employees, because the leader will clarify objectives and guide their subordinates accordingly (Malik, 2013). Zhu et al. (2009) revealed that a transformational leadership style is linked with engagement and the development of dynamic, visionary and creative employees. Leaders demonstrating high levels of engagement encourage employees to be innovative and move the organization onward, as engagement impacts the cognitive and emotional aspects of the employees (Kular et al., 2008).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In addition to what you have mentioned above, Transformational leaders encourage employees to go beyond their own self-interests and self-realization. The leaders of this type improve the sensitivity of the subordinates about the issues of consequence, growth, self actualization and ideals. They show “superior leadership performance” as they are able to motivate the subordinates to go beyond their individual self-interest, which is engagement (Mansor et al., 2017)

      Delete
  20. Hi Lakshmi,
    We can also take the Tierneys empirical study ( Friedrichsen, 2015), that describes the impact of leadership and the teams towards the change of the psychological climate of the employee. It is identified that the that the supervisors and the nature of the teams directly influences the employee’s climate perceptions due to the integral roles of the two entities in the change or the engagement process.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Line managers play a key role in enhancing job engagement with the support of organizational initiatives in the areas of job design, learning programmes, including leadership development for line managers, and performance and reward management
      systems. To enhance engagement managers should:
      ● make employees aware of their individual strengths;
      ● provide continuous feedback on how those strengths are being used;
      ● ‘clear the path’ so that employees can do what they do best without unnecessary
      distractions;
      ● build trust by showing commitment to the employee’s success;
      ● challenge people within areas of their distinctive strengths;
      ● focus upon particular skills and knowledge in order to build talent into strength;
      ● give employees ownership and creation of their outcomes.
      (Armstrong, 2014)

      Delete
  21. Engagement is a positive, two-way, relationship between an employee and their organization.Both parties are aware of their own and the other’s needs, and the way they support each other to fulfil those needs. Engaged employees and organizations will go the extra mile for each other because they see the mutual benefit of investing in their relationship (Chiumento (2004).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, Employees show more engagement towards the organisation when they see themselves getting praised by their immediate managers, they have the leadership’s attention (for example, one-on-one conversations) Leadership dimensions that are found to be most influential are making up a good mentor or manager and articulation of the vision (Chandani, 2016)

      Delete
  22. Hi Lakshmi,
    To add on further to your blog, Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their peers, colleagues, Management and organization. It is also about creating an environment where employees are motivated with need to connect with their work and maintaining the quality of job (Truss et al 2006).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How does an engaged workforce generate valuable business results for an organization?
      The process starts with employer practices such as job and task design, recruitment,
      selection, training, compensation, performance management and career development.
      Such practices affect employees’ level of engagement as well as job performance (Vance, 2006)

      Delete
  23. It is most useful to see employee engagement as a work environment approach intended to guarantee that workers are focused on their organisation’s goals and values, motivated to contribute to organizational success and are capable in the meantime to upgrade their very own sense of well-being
    (McLeod and Clarke 2011)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Worker engagement is observed to be higher in twofold digit development organizations. Explore likewise demonstrates that engagement is decidedly identified with consumer loyalty (Towers Perrin , 2003)

      Delete
  24. In work groups that employees are highly engaged, have better performance and retention due to these incidents it is to examine engagement works best with individually or working groups or both ? (Endres & Smoak, 2008).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hewitt Associates statement on engagement:
      Engagement is the state of emotional and intellectual commitment to an organization or group producing behavior that will help fulfill an organization's promises to customers - and, in so doing, improve business results. Engaged employees:
      *Stay - They have an intense desire to be a part of the organization and they stay with that organization;
      * Say - They advocate for the organization by referring potential employees and customers, are positive with co-workers and are constructive in their criticism;
      *Strive - They exert extra effort and engage in behaviors that contribute to business success. (Vance, 2016)

      Delete
  25. Truss et al. (2006), define employee engagement simply as passion for work and its a Psychological state and it captures the common theme running through all these definitions. Further, public sector has more negative experience of work, they reported more bullying and harassment than those in the private sector, and were less satisfied with the opportunities they had to use their abilities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One study (Harter et al., 2002) found that both employee satisfaction and engagement have a direct relationship to business outcomes. Their research involved 36 organisations, from a variety of public and private sector areas, and sought to examine the relationship between employee satisfaction, engagement and business unit outcomes. These included
      customer satisfaction, productivity, profit, employee turnover, and workplace accidents.

      Delete
  26. Hi,
    Employee engagement is characterized as a feeling of commitment, passion and energy which translates to the high levels of strength, importunity with even the most challenging task, exceeding expectations, taking initiatives better innovation. (Dickson, 2011).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To add to above, significance of engagement is that it is at the heart of the employment
      relationship. It is about what people do and how they behave in their roles and what makes them act in ways that further the achievement of the objectives of both the organization and themselves. Research reported by Watkin (2002) found that there were significant differences in value-added discretionary performance between ‘superior’ and ‘standard’ performers. The difference in low-complexity jobs was 19 per cent, in moderate-complexity jobs 32 per cent and in high-complexity jobs 48 per cent(Armstrong, 2008)

      Delete
  27. The success of an organization depends largely on its ability to adapt to the environment and its ability to connect people with their roles (Armstrong, 2006). Negative work environment will make employees were anxious and feeling annoyed. This can result in low productivity, lack of motivation and poor communication (Murphey ,2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As per Truss et al (2006), Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their colleagues, managers and wider organization. It is also about creating an environment where employees are motivated to want to connect with their work and really care about doing a good job.

      Delete
  28. Motivated employees can lead to increased productivity and empower an organization to achieve higher levels of production ( Thompson, 2016).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Employees who are positively engaged at work perform better and are more productive. Similarly, organisations with high engagement outperform those with low engagement. A study carried out by the Gallup Organisation in 2012 confirms this. It found that business units with engagement scores in the top quartile averaged 12 per cent higher profitability than those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile. Organisations where employees showed high levels of engagement demonstrated a greater capacity for innovation, experienced higher retention rates, less absenteeism and fewer work-related accidents (Chartered Management Institute, 2015)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Factors affecting employee engagement; Effective Communication and feedback

Employee Engagement: Way forward for a successful Organization ; Definition of Employee Engagement