Employee Engagement: Way forward for a successful Organization
Employee
Engagement: Way forward for a successful Organization
Definition
of Employee Engagement
Employee engagement or employee relation is a
two-way process where the employer and employee are responsible for the success
of the organization. Employee engagement could be defined as an emotional
attachment towards the organization, highly involved in the work with
enthusiasm for the success of the Organization (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010).
In engagement an employee, “is going extra mile beyond the employment contractual agreement” to fulfil
the assigned job, which is discretionary behaviour and part of psychological
contract (Purcell et al, 2003).
Ingredients
of job engagement as per Armstrong (2010) are motivation, commitment &
organizational citizenship behaviour. Therefore, employee engagement is a blend
of all three ingredients.
An engaged employee will be loyal in attitude, will go
beyond their minimum expectations to complete an assignment and will be a promoter
of their company to the clients. The result of the above will be lower accident
rate, higher output, fewer misunderstandings, and more creativity, less staff
turnover & reduced health issues (Vorina, 2017)
Employee
engagement is an element of Human Resource Management “creating opportunities for employees to connect with
their colleagues, managers and wider organization” (Armstrong, 2010). Both parties have their own expectations,
legal rights and responsibilities. The employees will perform their duties and
task in a satisfactory manner as per organizational policies and procedures
& employers in return treat them reasonably, fairly and consistently.
MacLeod and Clarke (2009) describe this as mutual respect between employee and
management.
As pointed out
by MacLeod and Clarke (2009) engagement is like two sides of a coin where
management should lay foundation to capture the heart and soul of the employee
and employee in return should fulfil the organizations goals. As explained by O’Riordan (2017) HR is important to “Create
a positive employment relationship between management and employees. Employees’ will give their best when they are given autonomy &
empowerment(Stewart, 2012) to carry out their work independently to achieve the set
KPI’s of the organization.
The importance of engagement
is elaborated in IES (2003)and states that people
should be treated as stake holders of an organization, ownership and
empowerment plays a major role in engagement and improve company
performance. Importance of engagement
was explained in service profit chain by Robinson et al (2004) as “from People
to Profit” starting from the committed line manager coupled with fair and
rewarding company culture, the level of employee’s engagement increases which enhances customer
satisfaction leading to higher customer spending and increased sales &
profitability of the organization.
Passionate employees who are engaged are
focused on achieving company’s goals at any cost, which is a key competitive
advantage in the modern world (Vorina et al, 2017). Further, improved employee
productivity had a positive effect on organizational financial performance
(Osborne & Hammoud, 2017). The bond between leaders and employees is an essential
element for engaging employees, which in turn increased organizational
profitability (Osborne et al, 2017).
As per Richard Branson of Virginia
Group, the employers should put “purpose and passion at the heart of their
plans” further he states that employer and employee should do what they love and
love what they do, which leads to self satisfaction and contributes to
satisfactory business performance.
A survey was conducted by Postgraduate
Institute of Management (PIM) among 12000 employees of IT, apparel sector &
BPO/KPO sector in Sri Lanka. It was revealed during the survey that “Meaningfulness
and the awareness of the job, supportive senior management and supportive
co-worker relationship are the factors that drive employee engagement”(Daily
FT, 2017)
Evolution of employee engagement
This
concept evolved from industrial relations (unitarism) to employee relations
(Pluralism). In unitarist approach the employer considered their employees to
share the same concerns and interests (collective orientation) which lead to
formation of trade unions and industrial revelation in the past. With that the
employers realized that individualized relationship with employees is important
for the success of a business (Millmore et al, 2007).
The short Film - Engage for Success explains how employee engagement help
organisations to be successful business entities.
Employee engagement or employee relation is a
two-way process where the employer and employee are responsible for the success
of the organization. Employee engagement could be defined as an emotional
attachment towards the organization, highly involved in the work with
enthusiasm for the success of the Organization (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010).
In engagement an employee, “is going extra mile beyond the employment contractual agreement” to fulfil
the assigned job, which is discretionary behaviour and part of psychological
contract (Purcell et al, 2003).
Ingredients of job engagement as per Armstrong (2010) are motivation, commitment & organizational citizenship behaviour. Therefore, employee engagement is a blend of all three ingredients.
The importance of engagement
is elaborated in IES (2003)and states that people
should be treated as stake holders of an organization, ownership and
empowerment plays a major role in engagement and improve company
performance. Importance of engagement
was explained in service profit chain by Robinson et al (2004) as “from People
to Profit” starting from the committed line manager coupled with fair and
rewarding company culture, the level of employee’s engagement increases which enhances customer
satisfaction leading to higher customer spending and increased sales &
profitability of the organization.
Passionate employees who are engaged are
focused on achieving company’s goals at any cost, which is a key competitive
advantage in the modern world (Vorina et al, 2017). Further, improved employee
productivity had a positive effect on organizational financial performance
(Osborne & Hammoud, 2017). The bond between leaders and employees is an essential
element for engaging employees, which in turn increased organizational
profitability (Osborne et al, 2017).
As per Richard Branson of Virginia
Group, the employers should put “purpose and passion at the heart of their
plans” further he states that employer and employee should do what they love and
love what they do, which leads to self satisfaction and contributes to
satisfactory business performance.
A survey was conducted by Postgraduate
Institute of Management (PIM) among 12000 employees of IT, apparel sector &
BPO/KPO sector in Sri Lanka. It was revealed during the survey that “Meaningfulness
and the awareness of the job, supportive senior management and supportive
co-worker relationship are the factors that drive employee engagement”(Daily
FT, 2017)
Evolution of employee engagement
Factors affecting employee engagement
1. Effective
Communication and feedback
Effective
communication plays a significant role in employee engagement (Osborne et al,
2017). A two-way communication between the employer and employee is important (IQN, 2017). Employer should clearly communicate their
expectations, organizational goals and targets to their employees and employees
in return should be given a chance to report their grievances and concerns.
This employee voice to be heard by the management and this makes the
organization “an employer of choice” (Armstrong, 2010). Organizations should look for leaders that can
both communicate the organization’s vision and secure employees’ support in
achieving organizational goals (Osborne et al, 2017) and employees to be given
a chance to open up without any repercussions. The best way to gain employee
views are the anonymous surveys in which people feel completely safe to speak
their minds. Its proven that
majority of people open up, and
ideas come out at informal meetings or gatherings (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010)
Feedback is a
great way of creating a learning environment, when feedback is extended by a
genuine leader who truly cares about employees. The time the employees realize the
leader truly cares about them, they starts respecting the leader and will
listen and obey. Further, will be ready to hear any feedback extended since staff
realizes the intention is for their own good and the success of the
organization (Cook, 2015).
Therefore, managers should use every opportunity for gathering feedback without
waiting for the annual appraisal (Walker, 2012). Management needs to create a feedback culture and the leaders to invite
feedback from others on their performance, their behaviour and its impact on
others(Cook, 2015). As per MacLeod and Clarke (2009) Tesco Chief Executive
Terry Leahy has recorded his reaction when he realized that the company knew
more about its customers than it did about its employees, and laid foundation
to learn about their employee’s strengths and needs which motivated staff to
give their best to the organization.
2. Engagement at
the time of recruitment
Ideally Engagement must start at the time of
recruitment, when calling for candidates for a particular job, the
advertisements must outline the attractive features such as challenging work
assignments, highly skilled team environment, and minimal supervision. Applicants
will be motivated by these features and act in response. At the interview the
management should communicate the role and the expectations clearly and not
keep space for ambiguities. The candidate should be encouraged to communicate
their concerns and raise queries and management in return to be flexible in
order to suite each and every requirement of the employee. A women candidate
could be single parent etc, where flexible working hours, family health
benefits and onsite day care centre to be introduced and encourage work life
balance for a sustainable and a long lasting relationship. Further in selecting
the right individual for the right job with few performance problems (Vance,
2006) Recruit candidates who are willing to be engaged which increase engagement
and organizational performance. As CEO
of the UK’s Happy Pvt Ltd, which had been awarded by the Great Place to Work
Institute writes, recruite for the candidates attitude and then train for
skills (Stewart, 2012).
3. Training and Development
Management further needs to spend on Training and Development to their
recruited employees, in order to understand the job, acquire knowledge and
development of skills which will benefit the employee to perform the job with
minimum supervision and without mistakes. An employee with adequate knowledge,
skill, and experience become experts in their field and enhance the self esteem
and increases the engagement level (Armstrong & Taylor,
2014) However, “Organizations should not embark on an
attempt to raise engagement levels unless they are prepared to invest
sufficiently into it — time, effort and money.”
(Robinson et al, 2004) The training to be extended to line managers as
well, they should be fully equipped to engage the employees for a mutually
beneficial relationship for organization and the employee. The line managers
must provide positive response to employees, improving relationship between
leaders and employees and employees feel valuable & worthwhile. The leader
should communicate differently with each employee since they come from
different background (Osborne et al, 2017). “The importance of the line manager
in the engagement model, for example, suggests that a major investment in line
management development might be needed” (Robinson
et al, 2004).
The reseach done on people who leaves organizations have proved that people
leave organizationa not for better propects but due to ineffective managers
(Walker, 2012).
4. Reward Structure
Reward
& Compensation
plays a major role in employee engagement. It could be either financial reward
such as salary, bonus, incentives and travel allowance and non-financial
benefits such as on-site day care, employee assistance programs, subsidized
cafeteria, company picnics, company gymnasium facilities & promotions. As
pointed out by Millmore et al, (2007) “The rewards from employment can be
economic, social and psychological”. A performance management system could be
utilized for rewarding high performing employees with higher salary increments
and bonuses to encourage them to be more engaged (Vance 2006). The management
must include in the appraisal the training requirements of the employees and
line managers to indicate that they truly care to sit down and discuss about
employee’s future aspirations and their further development needs. Further, as
per Osborne et al, 2017 “Leaders of organizations that fully support employees,
promote continuous learning, and are transparent in their decision-making, have
a greater impact on the increased level of employee engagement”.
5. Employment
security
Employment security is another factor which enhances employee engagement
levels. Healthy and a safe working environment will improve quality of life
enhancing employee engagement. Work places
should provide infrastructure to maintain healthy and a fully engaged
workforce. They could provide health insurance, wellness programs, gym &
yoga facilities to address the increasing health issues faced by the employees.
As Scott, 2017 states “today’s active workforce has become increasingly
affected by “lifestyle diseases,” such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes,
obesity and these types of diseases forcing employers to adopt strategies that
address the effects on employee health and well-being, engagement, and overall
performance.”
The organization which I work for is a leading
commercial bank and it provides the following facilities for the benefit of its
staff & in order to engage them for better performance of the Bank. The
management organized a series of health camps from beginning of last year
onwards, opened up the reimbursement of annual medical heath check-up expenses to all staff above 40
years of age, irrespective of the rank which once only availed to executive
staff. Even the spouse is entitled for and this is apart from the
Hospitalization Medical Scheme available to staff members of the bank. Further,
an innovative competition was organized by the name of “Lose to Win” and the
staff were grouped and over a period of time the group which lost maximum
weight were awarded. In addition, Online training courses as well as class room
training sessions are conducted to continuously improve the knowledge and to
motivate the employees. Increments and bonuses are being decided on an online
performance appraisals system and the percentage increase is decided by the
score at the end of the appraisal. A concept of Chief Employee Relations
Officer was introduced for the members to approach in grievances and problems.
Therefore, enabling employees to report direct to CERO independent from HR.
CERO appointed was a very senior member of the corporate management whom
employees trust & respect. These changes were brought in after an
employment survey conducted by an external company during a period of employee
unrest.
Conclusion
In conclusion it
is obvious that higher levels of employee engagement “improve the customer
satisfaction, productivity, and profit levels”(Osborne et al, 2017). Engagement is further elaborated by Millmore et al,
2007 as a tool for innovation, quality
enhancement and a cost reduction which enhances competitive advantage. Therefore it is evident that Management must treat employees as
“special and most important assets and they are the source of continuing
competitive advantage"(Henderson, 2011)
Therefore, it is evident that there is a correlation between the employee
engagement and the satisfactory performance of an organization.
As revealed by
Gallup (2006a) “out of a survey of 23,910 business units and comparing top
quartile and bottom quartile financial performance with engagement scores, Gallup
found that, those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile averaged 31–51
per cent more employee turnover, 51 per cent more inventory shrinkage and 62
per cent more accidents and those with engagement scores in the top quartile
averaged 12 per cent higher customer advocacy, 18 per cent higher productivity
and 12 per cent higher profitability.” Cook, 2015
reveals as per surveys carried out on engagement, “five per cent increase in
total employee engagement correlates to a 0.7 per cent increase in operating
margin and highly engaged employees were 87 per cent less likely to leave their
companies than their disengaged colleagues. In 2008 onwards US experienced a financial meltdown
due to disengaged employees, in turn affected the organizations financial performance
and finally country’s financial performance (Purcell, 2014).
List of References
Armstrong,
M (2010) Armstrong's Essential Human Resource Practice: A Guide to
People Management
Armstrong, M. &
Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management &
Practice. 13th ed. London: Koganpage.
Branson, R.
The best way to engage employees (Accessed online on 08/12/2018) https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/richard-branson-best-way-engage-employees
Cook,
S.(2015) Training Journal. Sarah Cook looks at the role in people developers
have in improving employee engagement. https://www.trainingjournal.com/articles/feature/leading-engagement. (Accessed online on 07/12/2018).
Dharmasiri,
A. (Daily FT, 02/10/2017) Engaging Employees for Enterprise Effectiveness:
Emerging evidence from Sri Lanka. http://www.ft.lk/columns/Engaging-employees-for-enterprise-effectiveness--Emerging-evidence-from-Sri-Lanka/4-640687.
(Accessed on line on 05/12/2018).
Engage for success – Short Film accessed
on line on 08/12/2018 by Chartered Management Institute.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV4YcgVIKneaq9di4afoLYw
Gallup (2006a) Feeling Good Matters
in the Workplace, Gallup Inc, London.
IQN, ( 2017) Diploma in Human Resource Management Course Book
by International Qualifications Network
Ivan Henderson, Human
Resource Management for MBA Students 2nd edition, Published by CIPD
2011
Kompaso, S. M.&Sridevi,
M. S.(2010) (Accessed online on 08/12/2018)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49586552_Employee_Engagement_The_Key_to_Improving_Performance.
MacLeod,
D and Clarke, N (2009) Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through
employee engagement, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
Millmore, M., Lewis P.,
Sanders M., Thornhill A., Morrow T. Strategic Human Resource Management - Contemporary
issue 2007. Published by Pearson Education Limited.
Osborne,
S. & Hammoud M., S. ( 2017)Effective
Employee Engagement in the Workplace , International Journal of Applied
Management and Technology 2017, Volume
16, Issue 1, Pages 50–67
Purcell,
J.,Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. & Swart,J. (2003) Understanding
the People and Performance Link: Unlocking the Black Box: London, Chartered
Institute of Personal and Development.
Robinson,
D., Perryman, S., Hayday, S. (2004) The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Institute of Employee Studies. IES report
408.
Vance, R., J. (2006) Employee engagement
& commitment: A
Guide to understanding, measuring and increasing engagement in your
organization (SHRM Foundation).
Vorina,
A., Simonic, M., Vlasova, M. (2017) Economic Themes – An Analysis of the
relationship between Job Satisfaction & employee engagement (p. 245)
Scott, A. (2017)Today’ key
to improving employee performance-Workplace Wellness. http://p5performance.org/todays-key-improving-performance-workplace-wellness(online accessed on 08/12/2108)
Stewart,
H. (2012) The Happy Manifesto – Make Your Organization a Great Place to
Work-Now (Foreword by professor Julion Birkshaw of London Business School)
Walker, S (2012)
Employee Enagagement & Communication Research- Measurement Stratergy &
Action.
Hi Lakshmi, Moving on to more statistical aspect of engagement, Towers Perrin (2007) found that
ReplyDeleteorganisations with the highest percentage of engaged employees increased their operating income by 19 per cent and their earnings per share by 28 per cent year‐to‐year. Highly engaging organisational cultures may also have an attractive, A review of current thinking employer brand, being an employer of choice which attracts and retains the best talent (eg Martin and Hetrick, 2006)
Hi, employee engagement leads to organizational success which was revealed from a survey conducted by Gallup (2006a) examining 23,910 business units and compared top quartile and bottom quartile financial performance with engagement scores. They found that: Those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile averaged 31–51 per cent more employee turnover, 51 per cent more inventory shrinkage and 62 per cent more
Deleteaccidents. Those with engagement scores in the top quartile averaged 12 per cent higher customer advocacy, 18 per cent higher productivity and 12 per cent higher profitability(Armstrong, 2010)
I agreed with you that it is important to keep a positive employment relationship with management and employees. Researchers show that keeping up strong relationships with others create satisfied and motivated employees in the company and they try in every possible ways to achieve the company goals. Also they feel positive and confidence to stay in the company (Civil Services, 2008).
ReplyDeleteMacLeod and Clarke (2009) pointed out that engagement is a two-way process: ‘organizations must work to engage the employee, who in turn has a choice about the level of engagement to offer the employer. Each reinforces the other.’ They also noted that ‘Engagement is about establishing mutual respect in the workplace for what people can do and be.’
DeleteEmployee engagement is identified in a different view by Cummings and Worley (2005), mentioning that, looking for inputs into decisions by members of an organization which affects the organization’s performance and well being of its employees.
ReplyDeleteIt could be said that, once an employee has a sense of empowerment, his or her engagement and performance then exceed expectations. Further many employees yearn for advancement opportunities(Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)
DeleteMore over to what you have explained here, Tredgold, (2018) illustrate five steps that drives employee engagement as Create sense of purpose, Employee involvement, Not over complicated things, Empowerment and Recognition. Though these factors drive engagement, Motivation plays a major role in employee engagement (Comaford, 2018). Engaged employees results in sustainable competitive advantage (Pandey, 2013)
ReplyDeleteYes agreed. For a organisation employee engagement can improve performance and productivity, release innovation and creativity, lead to high levels of customer service, facilitate the management of change, increase retention levels and boost interest in employee development. It is also a valuable source of competitive advantage (Charted Management Institute, 2015)
DeleteIn addition to what you have mentioned, Robinson et al. (2007) highlighted that there are associations between role and engagement levels, whereby senior managers, managers and operational hands‐on employees have the highest engagement levels, whilst professionals and ‘back‐room staff’ are less likely to be highly engaged with their organizations. Similarly, Blessing White (2008) also found a difference in engagement across occupations.
ReplyDeleteChandani et al., 2016, suggests that positive psychology interventions can be used to target employees that are disengaged or facing low engagement levels. Understanding the workforce profile is the foremost.Secondly organizations need to help create meaning for employees in their work. This can be achieved by making the employee understand the link between his contribution of his work and the overall business goals.
DeleteHi Lakshmi, on the topic I would like to share a point mentioned by Armstrong and Taylor (2014) called “Burnout”. It is explained as a syndrome of emotional exhaustion and cynicism. It happens due to excessive job demands, which include attempting to meet challenging, relentless and unreachable standards. The authors say in the pursuit of engagement, managements need to ensure that employees are not put under too much pressure, are provided with support when required and are recognized for what they can achieve with the resources they have available. Otherwise, it will result in factors such as failure, absenteeism or leaving the organization.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, recent research has shown that job resources may buffer the negative influence of job demands on work engagement. However, job resources are not only crucial for dealing with job demands but they are also important in their own right. For example, lack resources may lead to poor work engagement and increased levels of burnout symptoms (Upadyaya, 2016)
DeleteEmployee engagement is a key element for the success of any organization. An employee can work but if he is not psychologically connected with the job, the result is least. There are many org globally where their employees just perform their duties… but certain selected organization ( Eg Google) where the employees are happy and engaged and the organization performances are astonishing. According to Bakkar and Scheufeli, (2008), the term of employee engagement that “it is a psychological state where employees feel a vested interest in the organization’s success and perform to a high standard that may exceed the stated requirements of the job.
ReplyDeleteAn engaged employee is one who produces results, does not change job frequently and more importantly is the ambassador of the company at all times (Chandani et al., 2016)
DeleteChandani et al.(2016) list more factors affecting employee engagement, such as Health and Safety, Pay and Benefits, Performance Appraisal, Respectful Treatment of Employees, Career Development.
ReplyDeleteAs explained by Armstrong (2010) the principle of work–life balance is another factor of employee engagement i.e. ‘There should be a balance between an individual’s work and their life outside work, and that this balance should be healthy".
DeleteTo be able to do anything about engagement it is necessary to understand the factors that affect this – its antecedents and drivers. Crawford et al (2013:59–62) listed the following drivers:
ReplyDelete●● Job challenge
●● Autonomy
●● Variety
●● Feedback
●● Fit
●● Opportunities for development
●● Rewards and recognition
Employee engagement should Start from the top management: Employee engagement requires authority responsibility through building up clear mission, vision and qualities. Unless the general population at the top have faith in it, own it, pass it down to chiefs and representatives, and improve their authority, worker engagement will never be more than only a "corporate prevailing fashion" or "another HR thing"(Tripathi & Sharma, 2016)
DeleteWhen an employee demonstrates a positive, accomplished working mindset which can be characterized by dedication and absorption can be considered as an engaged employee (Kuok & Taormina, 2017). Further the positive attitude of an employee towards the organization and its value is considered as employee engagement ,an engaged employee would be aware of the business affairs and maximize performances for the betterment of the organization (Hettiararchchi & Jayarathna, 2014).
ReplyDeleteTo add on to your comment : The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is a successful UK company that has the concept of employee engagement at the heart of its business strategy. The RBS model suggests that having employees who say they are satisfied with their jobs at RBS is only the starting point; as a next step, these employees should also be committed (that is, say they want to stay with the company). The ultimate goal is an engaged workforce, containing employees who are willing to make an extra effort to help the company achieve its goals(Robinson et al., 2003)
DeleteIn addition what you mention rewards and reconditions will keep people highly engage and motivated. According to the diamond & diamond (2010) employees will motivate to below fact also health insurance, wellness programs, retirement plans, personal days, sick days, and vacation days, flextime, bonuses, incentives, and tuition reimbursement
ReplyDeleteStudies have shown that financial incentives are generally not the prime motivator of commitment and engagement. Nonetheless, perceptions of unfairness can be a powerful disengaging factor. It is important for employees to feel that they are being fairly compensated for their efforts, that pay and reward structures, including bonus schemes, are fair and equitable and that performance appraisals and performance management systems are applied fairly and consistently across the organisation (Chartered Management Institute 2015)
DeleteFurthermore, with regard to engagement, The motivation element in engagement plays a vital role. Macey et al (2009: 67) stated that ‘When the work itself is meaningful it is also said to have intrinsic motivation. This means that it is not the pay or recognition that yields positive feelings of engagement but the work itself". The authors also illustrated that engaged employees ‘feel that their jobs are an important part of what they are’ (ibid: 127).
ReplyDeleteEmployee motivation is directly linked to organizational commitment and employee engagement. “Organizational commitment is defined in terms of the strength of an individual’s identification with and involvement in a particular organization” , i.e. strong belief and acceptance of the organization’s goals and values, eagerness to work hard for the organization, and a desire to remain a member of the organization (Jensen, 2018)
DeleteHi Lakshmi, motivation is a very important factor in employee engagement and if the employee will leave the organization if they are not well motivated or properly respected (Comaford, 2018). If these needs are met and if they are satisfied, they will contribute to the organization with a greater retention level (Towes Perrin, 2003).
ReplyDeleteIt is proved that retaining employees need a systematic effort by employers to create and foster an environment that motivates employees to remain employed, by having policies and practices in place that addresses the diverse needs of employees. The biggest challenge that organizations are facing today is not only managing their human resources but also retaining them (Paul & Vincent, 2018)
DeleteIt can be added also as Employee Engagement can be defined as the spontaneous involvement in the role. (Kahn, 1990). The employees in the engagement perform themselves physically, cognitively and emotionally in the role.
ReplyDeleteThe organisations/employer need to work hard to prevent, and minimize the impact of, bad experiences. They also need to ensure that employees’ development needs (including
Deletethe special needs of professionals) are taken seriously; pay attention to, and value the roles of, support staff; and to maintain the interest of longer-serving employees (Robinson et al., 2003)
It can be noted as Employee Engagement effects the financial and the organizational accomplishments other than the employees results itself. (Shuck and Wollard, 2010). The engaged employees perform more effectively rather than the disengaged employees (SHRM Foundation, 2006). Therefore this can be identification for the organizations success.
ReplyDeleteIn this connection employer must play a major role. Effective leadership provides vision and direction for employee development. The ability for leadership to effectively communicate is a basis for employee engagement (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)
DeleteHi, ‘The Meaning of Employee Engagement’, Macey and Schneider (2008a) propose that engagement is sometimes defined on the basis of what it ‘is’ (psychological state), whilst on other occasions on the basis of the behaviours it produces (behavioural) and sometimes as a disposition or attitude towards one’s work (trait).
ReplyDeleteGeneral Electric CEO Jack Welch cited employee engagement first. No company, small or large, can win over the long run without energized employees who believe in the [firm's] mission and understand how to achieve it. As per Welch a company need to take the measure of employee engagement at least once a year through anonymous surveys in which people feel completely safe to speak their minds (Vance, 2016)
DeleteThe versatile role of Chief Employee Experience Officer (CEEO) is proof of HR's shift as a strategic business partner. HR industry analyst Joseh Bersin, founder and principal of Bersin by Deloitte, said the CEEO's task is to know "what is making employee productive at work and making sure that the tools that they are receiving at work from IT are helpin them to get their jobs done"( Ranosa.R (2018).
ReplyDeleteCEOs can act as “chief engagement officers” and directly interact with their employees through leadership and executive communication. This is particularly relevant in today’s social media era when communication hierarchies have been blurred by the interactive, personal, democratic, empowering, and relational features of social media tools. Thus, the power distance has been reduced, bringing CEOs into life and allowing them to communicate with their employees in a friendly, authentic, and informal manner (Linjuan, 2014)
DeleteHi, In addition: Engagement can affect employees’ attitudes, absence and turnover levels and
ReplyDeletevarious studies have demonstrated links with productivity, increasingly pointing
to a high correlation with individual, group and organisational performance, a
success measured through the quality of customer experience and customer
loyalty (Hemsley Fraser, 2008, cited in The HR Director, 2008; The Conference
Board, 2006). Organisations with higher engagement levels tend to have lower
employee turnover, higher productivity, higher total shareholder returns and
better financial performance (Baumruk, 2006)
For example: The U.S. Department of Labor (2015) identified employee engagement as a challenge, with a negative percentage of 35% or higher for organizations. Therefore, organizational leaders are rapidly finding ways to engage employees for long-term employment. Engaged employees are noted to having lower turnover rates and higher retention. Thirty percent of U.S. employees are engaged at work, and a staggeringly low 13% worldwide were engage. In addition, within the past 12 years, these percentages have changed minimally, meaning that worldwide, a high number of employees fail to develop and contribute at work (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017)
DeleteHi Lakshmi,
ReplyDeleteOther than what you have implied, another construct that impacts employee engagement is leadership. According to Yukl et al., (2009), participative leader behavior increases the positive valence of work for subordinates who require more independence, while directive leader behavior is thought to be especially effective with achievement focused employees, because the leader will clarify objectives and guide their subordinates accordingly (Malik, 2013). Zhu et al. (2009) revealed that a transformational leadership style is linked with engagement and the development of dynamic, visionary and creative employees. Leaders demonstrating high levels of engagement encourage employees to be innovative and move the organization onward, as engagement impacts the cognitive and emotional aspects of the employees (Kular et al., 2008).
In addition to what you have mentioned above, Transformational leaders encourage employees to go beyond their own self-interests and self-realization. The leaders of this type improve the sensitivity of the subordinates about the issues of consequence, growth, self actualization and ideals. They show “superior leadership performance” as they are able to motivate the subordinates to go beyond their individual self-interest, which is engagement (Mansor et al., 2017)
DeleteHi Lakshmi,
ReplyDeleteWe can also take the Tierneys empirical study ( Friedrichsen, 2015), that describes the impact of leadership and the teams towards the change of the psychological climate of the employee. It is identified that the that the supervisors and the nature of the teams directly influences the employee’s climate perceptions due to the integral roles of the two entities in the change or the engagement process.
Line managers play a key role in enhancing job engagement with the support of organizational initiatives in the areas of job design, learning programmes, including leadership development for line managers, and performance and reward management
Deletesystems. To enhance engagement managers should:
● make employees aware of their individual strengths;
● provide continuous feedback on how those strengths are being used;
● ‘clear the path’ so that employees can do what they do best without unnecessary
distractions;
● build trust by showing commitment to the employee’s success;
● challenge people within areas of their distinctive strengths;
● focus upon particular skills and knowledge in order to build talent into strength;
● give employees ownership and creation of their outcomes.
(Armstrong, 2014)
Engagement is a positive, two-way, relationship between an employee and their organization.Both parties are aware of their own and the other’s needs, and the way they support each other to fulfil those needs. Engaged employees and organizations will go the extra mile for each other because they see the mutual benefit of investing in their relationship (Chiumento (2004).
ReplyDeleteAgreed, Employees show more engagement towards the organisation when they see themselves getting praised by their immediate managers, they have the leadership’s attention (for example, one-on-one conversations) Leadership dimensions that are found to be most influential are making up a good mentor or manager and articulation of the vision (Chandani, 2016)
DeleteHi Lakshmi,
ReplyDeleteTo add on further to your blog, Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their peers, colleagues, Management and organization. It is also about creating an environment where employees are motivated with need to connect with their work and maintaining the quality of job (Truss et al 2006).
How does an engaged workforce generate valuable business results for an organization?
DeleteThe process starts with employer practices such as job and task design, recruitment,
selection, training, compensation, performance management and career development.
Such practices affect employees’ level of engagement as well as job performance (Vance, 2006)
It is most useful to see employee engagement as a work environment approach intended to guarantee that workers are focused on their organisation’s goals and values, motivated to contribute to organizational success and are capable in the meantime to upgrade their very own sense of well-being
ReplyDelete(McLeod and Clarke 2011)
Worker engagement is observed to be higher in twofold digit development organizations. Explore likewise demonstrates that engagement is decidedly identified with consumer loyalty (Towers Perrin , 2003)
DeleteIn work groups that employees are highly engaged, have better performance and retention due to these incidents it is to examine engagement works best with individually or working groups or both ? (Endres & Smoak, 2008).
ReplyDeleteHewitt Associates statement on engagement:
DeleteEngagement is the state of emotional and intellectual commitment to an organization or group producing behavior that will help fulfill an organization's promises to customers - and, in so doing, improve business results. Engaged employees:
*Stay - They have an intense desire to be a part of the organization and they stay with that organization;
* Say - They advocate for the organization by referring potential employees and customers, are positive with co-workers and are constructive in their criticism;
*Strive - They exert extra effort and engage in behaviors that contribute to business success. (Vance, 2016)
Truss et al. (2006), define employee engagement simply as passion for work and its a Psychological state and it captures the common theme running through all these definitions. Further, public sector has more negative experience of work, they reported more bullying and harassment than those in the private sector, and were less satisfied with the opportunities they had to use their abilities.
ReplyDeleteOne study (Harter et al., 2002) found that both employee satisfaction and engagement have a direct relationship to business outcomes. Their research involved 36 organisations, from a variety of public and private sector areas, and sought to examine the relationship between employee satisfaction, engagement and business unit outcomes. These included
Deletecustomer satisfaction, productivity, profit, employee turnover, and workplace accidents.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteEmployee engagement is characterized as a feeling of commitment, passion and energy which translates to the high levels of strength, importunity with even the most challenging task, exceeding expectations, taking initiatives better innovation. (Dickson, 2011).
To add to above, significance of engagement is that it is at the heart of the employment
Deleterelationship. It is about what people do and how they behave in their roles and what makes them act in ways that further the achievement of the objectives of both the organization and themselves. Research reported by Watkin (2002) found that there were significant differences in value-added discretionary performance between ‘superior’ and ‘standard’ performers. The difference in low-complexity jobs was 19 per cent, in moderate-complexity jobs 32 per cent and in high-complexity jobs 48 per cent(Armstrong, 2008)
The success of an organization depends largely on its ability to adapt to the environment and its ability to connect people with their roles (Armstrong, 2006). Negative work environment will make employees were anxious and feeling annoyed. This can result in low productivity, lack of motivation and poor communication (Murphey ,2013).
ReplyDeleteAs per Truss et al (2006), Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their colleagues, managers and wider organization. It is also about creating an environment where employees are motivated to want to connect with their work and really care about doing a good job.
DeleteMotivated employees can lead to increased productivity and empower an organization to achieve higher levels of production ( Thompson, 2016).
ReplyDeleteEmployees who are positively engaged at work perform better and are more productive. Similarly, organisations with high engagement outperform those with low engagement. A study carried out by the Gallup Organisation in 2012 confirms this. It found that business units with engagement scores in the top quartile averaged 12 per cent higher profitability than those with engagement scores in the bottom quartile. Organisations where employees showed high levels of engagement demonstrated a greater capacity for innovation, experienced higher retention rates, less absenteeism and fewer work-related accidents (Chartered Management Institute, 2015)
Delete